Disparitas Hukuman dalam Perkara Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan Putusan Nomor. 782/PID.B/2019/PN.Smg dan Putusan Nomor. 157/PID.B/2019/PN.Smg

Authors

  • Mia Novia Universitas Primagraha
  • Santi Universitas Primagraha
  • Setyaningsih Universitas Primagraha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58222/juruh.v3i1.772

Keywords:

Disparity in Sentencing Decisions, Crime of Theft with Aggravation, Judges' Considerations

Abstract

This research discusses disparities in judges' decisions regarding criminal acts of theft at the Semarang District Court, focusing on Decisions Number.782/PID.B/2019/PN.SMG and Number.157/PID.B/2019/PN.SMG. Judges, in determining punishment, not only follow legal provisions, but also consider human values, the principle of expediency, the effectiveness of punishment, and changes in the perpetrator's behavior. This research uses normative legal research methods with a comparative and case approach. Disparities were found in sentencing, especially in the duration of prison sentences. Judges tend to sentence with imprisonment rather than fines, in accordance with Article 363 paragraph (1) 4th of the Criminal Code. Factors causing disparities involve legal rules, judge's considerations, the amount of loss, and other influencing factors.

References

Abidin, Zainal. (2005). Pemidanaan, Pidana dan Tindakan dalam Rancangan KUHP 2005. Position Paper Advokasi RUU KUHP Seri # 3. Cet. I. (Zainal. Abidin, Ed.). ELSAM-Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat.

Arief, B. Nawawi. (1993). Sari Kuliah Hukum Pidana II. (B. Nawawi. Arief, Ed.).

Arief Nawawi Barda. (2001). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, (Arief Nawawi Barda, Ed.). PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Arief nawawi barda. (2001). masalah penegekan hukum dan kebijakan penanggulangan kejahatan (arief nawawi barda, Ed.). PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hartono Hadisoeprapto. (2001). Pengantar Tata Hukum Indonesia (Hartono Hadisoeprapto, Ed.).

Indung Wijayanto. (2012). DISPARITAS PIDANA DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN BIASA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI KOTA SEMARANG. Pandecta, 7.

Mertokusume Sudikno. (2002). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia (Mertokusumo Sudikno, Ed.).

mertokusumo sudikno. (2002). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia (mertokusumo sudikno, Ed.).

Moeljatno. (1993). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana (Moeljatno, Ed.). Rineka Cipta.

Mukti Aro. (2004). Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama (Mukti Aro, Ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Muladi. (1992). Lembaga Pidana Bersayarat (Muladi, Ed.).

Rifai Ahmad. (2011). penemuan hakum oleh hakim dalam perspektif hukum progresif (Rifai Ahmad, Ed.). Sinar Grafika.

Sholehuddin, M. (2004). Sistem Sanksi Dalam Hukum Pidana, Ide Dasar Double Track System & Implementasinya. Cet. 2 (M. Sholehuddin, Ed.). PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Waluyo, B. (2004). Pidana dan Pemidanaan (B. Waluyo, Ed.). Sinar Grafika.

Whayu Nugroho. (2012). DISPARITAS HUKUMAN DALAM PERKARA PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN. Jurnal Yudisial, 5, 261–282.

Mabsuti, M., & Fitnawati WN, S. (2023). THE ENFORCEMENT OF CRIMINAL LAW AGAINST VIOLENT THEFT CRIMES. JURNAL RUANG HUKUM, 2(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.58222/juruh.v2i1.256

Downloads

Published

2024-05-20

How to Cite

Novia, M., Santi, & Setyaningsih. (2024). Disparitas Hukuman dalam Perkara Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan Putusan Nomor. 782/PID.B/2019/PN.Smg dan Putusan Nomor. 157/PID.B/2019/PN.Smg. JURNAL RUANG HUKUM, 3(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.58222/juruh.v3i1.772