Implementation of Solving Criminal Cases (Splitsing) in the Proof Process in Criminal Trials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58222/juruh.v1i1.262Keywords:
Case solving, Crime, Proof of Justice SeekersAbstract
The role of a witness who is also an actor in the same case is referred to as a witness who is also a suspect "crown witness". The role of a witness is really needed to uncover a crime that was committed by more than one person together. To uncover evidence of who was involved, what were the roles of the perpetrators and how the crime could be committed. The purpose of this study is to find out how splitsing is implemented in criminal cases. The method used is philosophy juridical with a statutory and case approach, this study uses secondary data supported by primary legal materials such as laws, secondary legal materials in the form of journals and books. The results of this study indicate that the testimony of other defendants was carried out by the public prosecutor who has the authority to split the case files (spiltsing) so that the public prosecutor can reveal the testimony of witnesses and defendants that are the same or different and make it easier to find out the main perpetrators of the crime. The basis for separating the case files is in Article 142 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
References
Akmal, D. U. (2023). Indonesian State of Law: The Essence of Human Rights Protection in the Establishment of Laws and Regulation. Primagraha Law Review, 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.59605/plrev.v1i1.353
Amalia, M., Indah, R. H., Simanjuntak, M. M., Ramadhani, M., Maslul, S., Aryansah, J. E., ... & Tampubolon, M. (2022). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Get Press.
Djoko Prakoso. (1988). Pemecahan Perkara Pidana (Splitsing), Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Febrian, E. (2019). Splitsing dalam Perspektif Asas Contante Justitie dan Asas Non Self Incrimination. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 49(2), 107-130.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981
Modus Aceh. (2007). Sudut Pandang Jaksa, Splitsing dan Kemungkinan Pelanggaran Azashukum.
Moch Hilmansyah. (2015). Pelaksanaan Pemecahan Perkara Pidana (Splitsing) Sebagai Upaya Mempercepat Proses Pembuktian (Studi di Kejaksaan Negei Semarang). Skripsi. Program Sarjana, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang. Semarang.
Priyana, Yana, et.al (2023). Exploring the Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practice in Criminal Law System. West Science Law and Human Rights. Vol. 1 No. 03 (2023).
Rahayu Muin. (2008). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pemisahan Berkas Perkara Pidana (Splitsing) Oleh Penuntut Umum. Skripsi. Program Sarjana, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanudin. Makassar.
Rohman, M. M., Purwoto, A., Amalia, M., Rumalean, Z. Z., Romdoni, M., Ingratubun, F., ... & Hamid, A. (2023). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Global Eksekutif Teknologi
Rompas, C. (2016). Pemecahan Perkara Pidana (Splitsing) Sebagai Upaya Untuk Mempercepat Proses Pembuktian. Lex Privatum: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Unsrat, 4(2), 113.
Romdoni, M., & Putri Abu Bakar, A. (2022). The Role of the Justice Collaborator in A Premeditated Murder Crime. LEGAL BRIEF, 11(5), 3033–3041. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i5.589
Suyanto. (2018). Hukum Acara Pidana, Sidoarjo: Zifatama Jawara.
Tiolong, I.A. (2018). Wewenang Pemecahan Perkara (Splitsing) Oleh Penuntut Umum Menurut Pasal 142 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981. Lex Crimen: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Unsrat, 7(6), 146.
Widayati, W. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia yang Demokratis. PLEDOI (Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan), 1(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.56721/pledoi.v1i1.28
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Firyal Kamila, Iyang Yanuar, Rizki Nurdiansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
