Evaluation of Electronic MedicalRecords (SIMPUS) at ABC XYZ Community Health Center Using the EUCS Method

Authors

  • Berkah Putri Lefesi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Sapta Bakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58222/hbcwm208

Keywords:

EUCS, simpus, electronic medical records, community health centers, health information system evaluation

Abstract

The  Health  Center  Information  System  (SIMPUS)  as  an  electronic  medical record platform is a key instrument in realizing the digitalization of primary health  services  in  Indonesia.  However,  implementation   without  proper evaluation risks resulting in systems that do not meet user needs. This study evaluates user satisfaction with the electronic medical records (SIMPUS) at Puskesmas   ABC,   XYZ   Regency,   YYY   Province   using   the   End   User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) method. The research employs a descriptive quantitative approach  with a cross-sectional design. Respondents consisted of  52  health   workers   who  actively  use  SIMPUS,  selected  using  total sampling.  Data  were  collected  through  a  structured  questionnaire  adapted from  the  EUCS  instrument  covering  five  dimensions:  Content,  Accuracy, Format,  Ease  of  Use,  and  Timeliness.  Validity  and  reliability  tests  were conducted  before  data  collection.  Data  analysis  used  descriptive  statistics and  gap  analysis  between  expectations  and  perceptions.  Results  show  an overall  user  satisfaction  index  of  72.6%  (Good  category).  The  highest satisfaction was found in the Accuracy dimension (75.8%) and the lowest in the  Ease  of  Use  dimension  (67.4%).  Gap  analysis  reveals  the  largest negative gap in Ease of Use (gap score: −0.74), indicating that system ease of use is the most critical aspect requiring improvement. The novelty of this research  lies  in  the  application  of  gap  analysis  between  user  expectations and  actualperceptions  as  an  enrichment  of  the  standard  EUCS  method, providing    deeper    diagnostic    information    for    system    improvement recommendations  that  are  more  targeted  and  actionable  specifically  for SIMPUS in the Puskesmas context.

References

[1] Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 31 Tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Informasi Puskesmas. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI.

[2] Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 tentang Rekam Medis. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI.

[3] Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/248851

[4] Nurhayati, S., Widodo, S., & Pratiwi, R. (2021). Evaluasi Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Puskesmas (SIMPUS) Menggunakan Metode End User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Manajemen Informasi Kesehatan Indonesia, 9(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.33560/jmiki.v9i2.371

[5] Rahmawati, D., & Hidayat, S. (2022). Tingkat Kepuasan Pengguna terhadap SIMPUS Berbasis FKTP di Kabupaten Banyumas: Pendekatan EUCS. Jurnal Rekam Medis dan Informasi Kesehatan, 5(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.31983/jrmik.v5i1.7841

[6] Oktavia, N., Supriyatna, A., & Gunawan, W. (2023). Analisis Kepuasan Pengguna Aplikasi P-Care BPJS yang Terintegrasi dengan SIMPUS di Fasilitas Kesehatan Tingkat Pertama Jawa Barat. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat, 8(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.24198/jsikm.v8i1.43217

[7] Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

[8] Sintawati, M., & Putra, I. K. G. D. (2022). Pengukuran Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Rumah Sakit Menggunakan Metode EUCS. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 9(2), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.2022924290

[9] Wahyuni, A., Sari, R. P., & Kurniawan, H. (2022). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Kesehatan di Fasilitas Pelayanan Kesehatan Primer Indonesia: Systematic Review. Jurnal Kesehatan Vokasional, 7(3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkesvo.69841

[10] Handayani, P. W., Hidayanto, A. N., & Ayuningtyas, D. (2021). Hospital Information System User Acceptance Analysis in Indonesian Public Hospitals. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 14(4), 1271–1282. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2020.1727431

[11] Rahimi, B., Nadri, H., Lotfnezhad Afshar, H., & Timpka, T. (2018). A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model in Health Informatics. Applied Clinical Informatics, 9(3), 604–634. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1668091

[12] Pratiwi, R. A., & Darmawan, D. (2022). Analisis Kepuasan Tenaga Kesehatan terhadap Penggunaan SIMPUS di Puskesmas Pedesaan. Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia, 10(2), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v10i2.2022.183-194

[13] Susanto, A., Hidayatullah, M. F., & Lutfi, I. (2023). Evaluasi Usability Sistem Informasi Puskesmas Menggunakan System Usability Scale dan EUCS: Studi Kasus di Provinsi YYY. Jurnal Informatika Kesehatan, 4(1), 23–34.

[14] Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten XYZ. (2023). Profil Kesehatan Kabupaten XYZ Tahun 2022. YYY: Dinkes Kabupaten XYZ.

[15] Arikunto, S. (2021). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Evaluation of Electronic MedicalRecords (SIMPUS) at ABC XYZ Community Health Center Using the EUCS Method. (2025). SMART : Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komputer , 4(2), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.58222/hbcwm208

Similar Articles

21-29 of 29

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.